Arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia in a patient on chronic hemodialysis.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a rare acute leukemia generally considered curable with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). Some patients have co-morbidities that may limit the use of these agents and therefore impact curability. Adverse effects of ATO include life-threatening electrocardiographic abnormalities. ATO and its metabolites are partially excreted in the urine, and it is unclear to what extent ATO pharmacokinetics are impacted by hemodialysis. We present a patient on chronic hemodialysis successfully treated with ATO and ATRA for newly diagnosed APL. Complete molecular remission was achieved after induction and several drug-related toxicities were managed.

Arsenic trioxide dose capping to decrease toxicity in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combination therapy yields high complete remission and disease-free survival rates in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). ATO is dosed on actual body weight and high ATO doses in overweight patients may contribute to increased toxicity. We performed a retrospective, two-center study comparing toxicities in patients who received the Lo-Coco et al ATRA/ATO regimen with capped ATO, ≤10 mg/dose, and non-capped ATO, >10 mg/dose. A total of 44 patients were included; 15 received doses ≤10 mg and 29 received >10 mg. During induction, there was no difference in the incidence of grade ≥3 hepatotoxicity, grade ≥3 QTc prolongation, neurotoxicity, and cardiac toxicity between groups. In consolidation, patients receiving >10 mg/dose experienced a greater incidence of neurotoxicity (66.7% vs 22.2%; p = 0.046). Capping doses saved $24634.37/patient and reduced waste of partially-used vials. At a median follow-up of 27 months, no disease relapses occurred in either group. This represents an opportunity to improve the safety profile of this highly effective regimen.

Glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia: Practical considerations from advanced practitioners and pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is primarily a disease of older adults. These patients may not be candidates for intensive treatment, and there has been an ongoing need for treatment options for this group. We review the use of glasdegib, a hedgehog-pathway inhibitor available for use in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC).Data Sources: PubMed and relevant congress abstracts were searched using the term "glasdegib". In addition, based on our experience with glasdegib, we considered treatment aspects of particular relevance to pharmacists and advanced practitioners.Data Summary: In a randomized phase II study, the combination of glasdegib plus LDAC demonstrated superior overall survival versus LDAC alone (hazard ratio 0.51, 80% confidence interval 0.39-0.67, p = 0.0004). The trial reported adverse events (AEs) of special relevance for older patients, such as hematologic events, gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue, as well as AEs associated with Hh-pathway inhibitors (alopecia, muscle spasms, dysgeusia). Educating patients about typical AEs can facilitate adherence as well as early AE identification and proactive management. For LDAC, which is a long-established therapy in AML, various stages of delivery need consideration, with attention to individual circumstances. Practical measures such as dispensing a longer supply can reduce the number of return clinic visits, providing a meaningful difference for many patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists and advanced practitioners play important roles in treatment with glasdegib plus LDAC. Ultimately, framing plans for treatment delivery within the individual circumstances of each patient may enable them to stay on therapy longer, giving them the greatest potential to achieve benefit.

Moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk for relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia: a review of clinical considerations.

PURPOSE: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B cell leukemia. Purine analogs are the mainstay of treatment of HCL, but relapse after purine analog therapy is common. Outcomes of treatment of relapsed/refractory HCL typically diminish with each successive line of therapy. Moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk is a novel recombinant immunotoxin approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory HCL who have received at least two prior therapies, including a purine analog. This article reviews HCL treatment, focusing on moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk, its place in therapy, considerations for preparation and administration, and strategies for prevention and management of toxicities. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database from inception to January 2019, using the following terms: moxetumomab, hairy cell leukemia, relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia, immunotoxin, and CD22. The package insert and available posters and abstracts were also reviewed. RESULTS: FDA approval of moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk was based on a phase III single-arm, open-label trial in 80 patients. Treatment with moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk yielded a durable complete response rate of 30% with a median duration of response that had not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 16.7 months. The objective response rate was 75% based on blinded independent central review. The most common adverse reactions were infusion-related reactions, edema, nausea, fatigue, headache, pyrexia and anemia. Serious adverse events include capillary leak syndrome and hemolytic uremic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians providing care for patients receiving moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk should be aware of the strategies required for safe administration, including the management of serious adverse events.

Evaluation of the head and neck cancer patient population and the incidence of hospitalization at an academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Patients with head and neck cancer are at risk for disease- and treatment-related toxicities that may be severe enough to require hospitalization. The risk factors associated with hospitalization in these patients are not well defined. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study of patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemotherapy at an academic medical center infusion clinic in a one-year period. The primary objective was to characterize the head and neck cancer population at an academic medical center. Secondary objectives included describing the clinical and social factors associated with hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 109 patients with head and neck cancer included in the analysis. Of these patients, 38 (35%) were hospitalized. The factors that were significantly associated with hospitalization on univariable logistic regression were former alcohol abuse, being on a nonstandard of care chemotherapy regimen, and having a chemotherapy agent discontinued. On multivariable logistic regression, the factor that was significantly associated with hospitalization was having a chemotherapy agent discontinued. The most common reasons for hospitalization included shortness of breath/respiratory failure, fever/neutropenic fever, and infection. The most common new supportive care medications prescribed at discharge were stool softeners or laxatives and opioids. CONCLUSION: This study identified several factors which may be useful to identify patients as high risk for hospitalization and the next steps will be to determine and study the role of the pharmacist in preventing hospitalization of these patients. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of adding a pharmacist to the head and neck cancer multidisciplinary team.

Effects of the leucovorin shortage: Pilot study investigating cost, efficacy, and toxicity comparison of low fixed-dose versus body surface area-adjusted leucovorin dosing in patients with resectable colon or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Purpose As a result of the leucovorin shortage, we switched from BSA-adjusted to low fixed-dose leucovorin in patients with colon cancer receiving fluorouracil-containing therapy. Methods A retrospective, pilot study of adults receiving intravenous leucovorin as part of a fluorouracil-containing treatment was conducted including individuals with stage II or III colon or newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer. One low fixed-dose (leucovorin 50 mg) patient was matched by the investigator to one BSA-adjusted (leucovorin 200-500 mg/m2/dose) patient on disease stage and age. The objectives were to compare cost of alternative dosing strategies as well as efficacy and adverse event rates. Only patients being treated in the first-line metastatic colorectal cancer setting were included in the efficacy analysis. Results Fifty-eight patients were included. Leucovorin cost was reduced by 7- to 14-fold, and we were able to conserve a total of 1580-3400 doses of leucovorin by changing to fixed-dose (estimated from 200 mg/m2 or 400 mg/m2 dosing strategies, respectively). No statistically significant differences in progression-free survival ( p = 0.254), overall survival ( p = 0.923), or complications resulted. Conclusion Our decision to reduce the dose of leucovorin allowed us to conserve supply and control cost. The small sample size did not allow us to detect differences in efficacy or adverse event rates, and thus a larger study would be required to confirm our findings that efficacy was not compromised nor adverse effects greater.

A review of blinatumomab, a novel immunotherapy.

Blinatumomab is a novel bispecific CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager recently approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. The drug was approved after a phase II trial in adults with relapsed/refractory disease demonstrated complete remission or hematologic complete remission in 43% of patients within two treatment cycles, of which 40% went on to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In a long-term survival analysis of patients with minimal residual disease after chemotherapy, hematologic relapse-free survival was estimated at 61% at a median of 33 months after blinatumomab. Nine patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and six patients remained in complete remission without hematopoietic stem cell transplant or further therapy. Limited data in relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia are reviewed. Blinatumomab carries boxed warnings for neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome, which may be serious and lead to treatment interruption and discontinuation. Clinical controversies with blinatumomab include use in patients with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, dosing in underweight adults, and the optimal management of cytokine release syndrome. Oncology pharmacists must be aware of detailed preparation and administration procedures required for safe use of blinatumomab. Clinical trials are ongoing in the first-line setting for patients with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and other B-cell malignancies.

Nonadministration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with HIV: a missed opportunity for prevention?

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) appear to be at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Previous work at our institution has demonstrated that the proportion of doses administered varies between patients and locations. OBJECTIVE: To compare the proportion of doses of thromboprophylaxis not administered between patients with and without HIV. DESIGN: Using retrospective data, the proportion of nonadministered doses was determined in all hospitalized adults and stratified by HIV status. SETTING: Large, urban, academic medical center in Baltimore, Maryland. PATIENTS: Data were available for 4947 patient visits, 583 of which were by patients with HIV. Most visits by patients with HIV were to a designated HIV care unit. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of doses of thromboprophylaxis not administered, and documented reasons for dose nonadministration. RESULTS: A total of 42,870 doses were prescribed. The proportion of doses not administered was greater for patients with HIV (23.5%) compared with patients without HIV (16.1%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-1.70, P < 0.001). Documented dose refusal accounted for a greater proportion of nonadministered doses in patients with HIV (15.9% vs 10.8%, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.43-1.70, P < 0.0001). On the HIV care unit, the proportion of doses not administered was greater for patients with HIV (26.4% vs 13.1%, OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.93-2.96, P < 0.001). Within this unit, documented dose refusal was greater for patients with HIV (13.7% vs 10.7%, OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16-1.51, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonadministration and documented refusal of thromboprophylaxis appear to be more common in patients with HIV at our institution.

Cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant 250 mg versus 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and disease progression after antiestrogen therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant 250 mg compared to 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and disease progression after antiestrogen therapy. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to find the incremental cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant 250 mg monthly when compared with the 500 mg monthly in patients with progression after antiestrogen therapy. The model duration was 24 months. Clinical efficacy data inputs were derived from a phase III clinical trial demonstrating a statistically significant increase in progression-free survival in patients receiving 500 mg versus 250 mg. Cost data utilized were all relevant Ambulatory Payment Classification payment rates from the 2011 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to test the model at various willingness to pay thresholds. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as determined by the Markov model was US$10,972 per month of progression-free survival for the 500 mg dose compared with the 250 mg dose. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, it was found that 500 mg monthly was cost-effective at and above the willingness to pay threshold of US$15,000 per month. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses showed this result is robust to geographical practice variations in costs of drug administration and physician examination. CONCLUSION: From a third party payer perspective, the value of fulvestrant 500 mg monthly is dependent on the willingness to pay threshold. Despite a labeling change for fulvestrant in September 2010, fulvestrant 250 mg monthly appears to be a viable option in the target population.

An anesthesiologist with an allergy to multiple neuromuscular blocking drugs: a new occupational hazard.

We report a case of a final-year anesthesiology trainee who developed a severe allergic reaction to cutaneous exposure of succinylcholine. Intradermal testing was strongly positive to succinylcholine and all the aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs). Specific immunoglobulin E to succinylcholine was also strongly positive. This unusual case of an anesthesiologist acquiring an allergy to an NMBD through occupational exposure has a significant effect on his practice of anesthesia. However, by avoiding operating rooms with a high usage of NMBDs and by wearing personal protective equipment, the anesthesiologist has worked in clinical anesthesia without incident.